Wilner: On why the PAC 12 will not go back to 8 conference games
- By rward
- Buff Nation
- 7 Replies
Lingering matter No. 2: Many, many fans suggested that the conference simply reduce the number of conference games (from nine to eight), add a cupcake, SEC-style, and take its best shot at the playoff.
Weakening the schedule doesn’t strengthen the product. No, no, no.
(Also, the fourth non-conference game hasn’t helped the SEC, broadly speaking. In three years of committee rankings, only Alabama has qualified for the playoff. No other team has been in the committee’s top eight on the final weekend.)
It’s my belief that the Pac-12 won’t drop to eight conference games, ever — no way, no chance. Eight doesn’t work on so many levels, including:
* The selection committee wants stronger schedules, not weaker ones.
Removing a quality Pac-12 win and adding a creampuff win won’t help. Removing a Pac-12 loss and adding a creampuff win won’t help, either.
* The reduction in conference-game inventory would prompt Fox and ESPN to ask for money back on their Tier 1 deals. They aren’t paying the same for Oregon-Idaho as they would for Oregon-Arizona.
* Non-conference games are difficult to schedule and far more expensive than you’d think.
Replacing the fourth or fifth conference home game with Sacramento State or Eastern Washington would likely hurt ticket sales/gate receipts and likely cost well in excess of $500,000.
(Washington paid Fresno State $1 million to visit Husky Stadium this season.)
* Fewer conference games would mean fewer opportunities for the non-California teams to make an appearance in the richest recruiting ground in the west.
The CA schools aren’t giving up their round robin, so the reduction would have to come out of the other teams’ schedules.
Again: Not happening.
http://www.mercurynews.com/2017/11/...o-lets-move-on-power-ratings-special-edition/
Weakening the schedule doesn’t strengthen the product. No, no, no.
(Also, the fourth non-conference game hasn’t helped the SEC, broadly speaking. In three years of committee rankings, only Alabama has qualified for the playoff. No other team has been in the committee’s top eight on the final weekend.)
It’s my belief that the Pac-12 won’t drop to eight conference games, ever — no way, no chance. Eight doesn’t work on so many levels, including:
* The selection committee wants stronger schedules, not weaker ones.
Removing a quality Pac-12 win and adding a creampuff win won’t help. Removing a Pac-12 loss and adding a creampuff win won’t help, either.
* The reduction in conference-game inventory would prompt Fox and ESPN to ask for money back on their Tier 1 deals. They aren’t paying the same for Oregon-Idaho as they would for Oregon-Arizona.
* Non-conference games are difficult to schedule and far more expensive than you’d think.
Replacing the fourth or fifth conference home game with Sacramento State or Eastern Washington would likely hurt ticket sales/gate receipts and likely cost well in excess of $500,000.
(Washington paid Fresno State $1 million to visit Husky Stadium this season.)
* Fewer conference games would mean fewer opportunities for the non-California teams to make an appearance in the richest recruiting ground in the west.
The CA schools aren’t giving up their round robin, so the reduction would have to come out of the other teams’ schedules.
Again: Not happening.
http://www.mercurynews.com/2017/11/...o-lets-move-on-power-ratings-special-edition/